VIDEO: Yes, your TV really may be watching you

VIDEO: Kerry Sanders and I discuss SmartTV, privacy violations, and what's coming next. Click to watch.
VIDEO: Kerry Sanders and I discuss SmartTV, privacy violations, and what’s coming next. Click to watch.

After we all did Big Brother stories last week about Samsung’s ominous Smart TV privacy policy, more alarming information was found. The biggest “Doh!” — Samsung not only collects what you say in your living room, it uploads the content in the clear, without encrypting it. That means anyone who can insert themselves between your TV and Samsung’s collection devices and partners can hear what you say on your couch. Not a surprise: New gadgets always arrive with features first, security second. Watch this pattern play out again and again as The Internet of Creepy Things invades our home.

Samsung had to admit the design failure after security researchers discovered it in the wake of all the other Samsung stories published last week. Samsung told the BBC that a firmware update will add encryption, but the damage is done: Should consumers believe it takes privacy seriously? Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) isn’t so sure, and he vowed to investigate last week

As I wrote last week, I feel a bit bad for Samsung, as it was undone by the honesty of its privacy policy. To learn a little more about what’s going on, click on the TODAY video above. Or keep reading below, where I’ve pasted the text of last week’s story

As a leader of the oft-paranoid-sounding-privacy-sensitive crowd, let me be the first to congratulate Samsung for its honesty. Plenty of my friends in paranoia have pointed out the language included in Samsung’s new SmartTV privacy policy. Because the gizmo uses voice recognition to let owners change the channel and do other cool things, naturally the TV has to “watch you.” And anyone paying attention knows just what that means:

“Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party,” says Samsung’s privacy policy. Good on ’em.

Am I just being paranoid, or do you also dislike the idea of your living room chatter being recorded and sent off to unknown “third parties?” Don’t answer that.

In truth, this is just lawyerspeak. Samsung and its partners don’t want to hear about your Aunt Ethel’s health problems, and they don’t want to listen in on your makeout sessions. Really, I believe that. Any gadgeteer working on systems like these, which are tricky and usually clunky, wants to know how they are being used any how to improve them. Of course. A very responsible lawyer forced the firm to include that disclosure in the interest of completeness. It sounds worse than it is.

Until, it isn’t.

Recall that every record stored in any computer anywhere can be obtained by law enforcement, or really anyone acting on behalf of a court of law. Forget Ed Snowden and super-spooky FBI software monitoring phone calls. The FBI can simply ask Samsung, or its “third-party” suppliers, and obtain records of what happens in your living room. So can (until someone proves otherwise) folks investigating civil claims, such as…..divorce lawyers. Those makeout sessions would be of plenty of interest to them.

“I totally can see the FBI or others approaching Samsung … probably without thinking there’s any need for a warrant .. and saying they were after a ‘bad guy’ and ‘asking’ for that data,” said a former colleague of mine, Steve White. He is now president of White Marsh Forests Inc., a firm working on machine learning technology. “Happened regularity at MSN…MSNBC. Now I’m staring warily at my Samsung laptop.”

To be clear, it’s settled law in the U.S. – any information you share with a “third party” private company can be obtained by law enforcement. You surrender any expectation of privacy once you disclose something to a corporation, or any third party. It’s the biggest end-around in American privacy law.

Don’t blame Samsung for this. It’s just telling the truth. I hope you are now wondering about any other gizmos you have invited into your home that watch you. Smart thermostats? Internet-enabled crock pots? Yup, these things can squeal to anyone about you. They can relate when you come home at night and plenty of other very personal details about your life. Any technology that watches (or listens) to you creates a record that can be used against you. Even if you are in the “privacy” of your own living room. And our living rooms (and bedrooms) are about to be inundated with this stuff under the friendly name of the “Internet of Things.” I’m sure it won’t be long until the newest state of the art furniture is also recording our conversations at home, that is unless you prefer your furniture to be made up of antiques instead of more modern pieces.

The problem is the law. Of course Samsung should be able to see how its technology is working, and be able to learn from real-world uses. We just need to pass laws that make it expressly, unequivocally illegal to use that information for anything other than its intended purpose, and require that it be permanently deleted as soon as that intended purpose is complete. Notice, I didn’t say the data should be anonymized, because (if you’ve been paying attention), it’s really hard to anonymize data. It needs to be deleted. The privacy of 100 million living rooms shouldn’t be up for grabs so law enforcement might have a slightly easier time catching a criminal every once in a while. That’s not the way America should work.

Thanks, Samsung for helping me feel a little less paranoid. And hopefully making a few more people feel a lot more paranoid.

Sign up for Bob Sullivans’s free email newsletter.

Don’t miss a post. Sign up for my newsletter

About Bob Sullivan 1638 Articles
BOB SULLIVAN is a veteran journalist and the author of four books, including the 2008 New York Times Best-Seller, Gotcha Capitalism, and the 2010 New York Times Best Seller, Stop Getting Ripped Off! His latest, The Plateau Effect, was published in 2013, and as a paperback, called Getting Unstuck in 2014. He has won the Society of Professional Journalists prestigious Public Service award, a Peabody award, and The Consumer Federation of America Betty Furness award, and been given Consumer Action’s Consumer Excellence Award.

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. VIDEO: Police ask Amazon Echo to ‘testify’ against owner; why smart homes require smart laws, fast – Bob Sullivan
  2. Amazon Alexa search warrant in hot-tub murder case shows why smart homes require smart laws – GeekWire | Home Fine Shopping
  3. Amazon Alexa search warrant in hot-tub murder case shows why smart homes require smart laws – TechGoor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.