Time’s running out! You’d better read this — the scary power of scarcity

It’s foundational to almost every scam you’ve ever read about. Act fast! Last chance! It’s also the force behind much unsavory human behavior.  Fighting over distribution of scarce resources brings out the worst in us.  It’s part of what makes racism so powerful (“They’re taking YOUR jobs!”).

That’s why it’s so important to understand the role scarcity plays in our lives.  It’s a force of nature that cannot be avoided and should not be ignored.  It’s also a fact of life. Sometimes there isn’t enough money or seats on an airplane.  But I learned in writing this piece for PeopleScience that scarcity isn’t *just* about rarity; it’s also about value. You probably wouldn’t fight over the last piece of liver at the grocery store, but you might fight over the last piece of filet mignon.  A big part of winning the fight against scarcity manipulation is to avoid being tricked into valuing something just *because* it’s rare.  But there’s a lot more to scarcity than you think.  Here’s a sample of the story: You can read the whole Know Your Nuggets piece at PeopleScience.

You’re thinking about a trip to Europe and you’ve found a great deal on airfare. You’re excited, but still mulling things over. Then, the travel website you are using displays this ominous message:

“Only 2 left at this price.”

Excitement turns to panic. You have to act fast! You can feel the clock ticking. Who knows how much the price might rise if those last two seats are sold out from under your e-shopping cart? Your spouse might kill the idea!

Suddenly, a trip you were simply mulling over becomes a trip you almost can’t live without. You’ve become a victim of scarcity bias.

Scarcity is a bedrock principle of economics. In some ways, it’s the evil twin of cost. Rare things are often expensive, and the rarer they become, the more their price rises. Gold, diamonds, Springsteen on Broadway tickets. Long before everyone had FOMO, economists had scarcity.

Scarcity isn’t just rarity, however. Plenty of rare items aren’t worth very much. I play music in Irish pubs sometimes. When I play at a small bar, the price doesn’t go up. When Bruce (Springsteen!) plays in a small venue, however, ticket prices soar.

So scarcity is a mix of both rarity and value. Value is in the eye of the beholder, however, and the way people value things can be manipulated. In a wonderful experiment, classical violin player Joshua Bell performed a free “concert” in Washington, D.C., subways in 2017. More than 1,000 people walked by and only a tiny handful stopped to listen. Earlier that year, Bell sold out the nearby Kennedy Center.

In the classic scarcity experiment, researcher Stephen Worchel recruited 200 students to rate the quality of cookies. One set picked from a jar of 10 cookies, the other from a jar with only two (the cookies were identical). Not only did students strongly prefer the more “rare” cookies, they indicated they were willing to pay 11% more for them.

Scarcity bias has an obvious link to our evolutionary past, when planning for scarcity was a matter of life and death. Hoarding food made sense when food was limited and dinner had to be hunted and killed. While most humans no longer live under those precise scarcity conditions, similar circumstances can arise. In 2005, I covered Hurricane Rita in Houston, just a few weeks after Hurricane Katrina ravaged New Orleans. Our well-built hotel promised to stay open and had plenty of food, and it generally kept a buffet available. But as the storm arrived, and nerves started to fray, it was obvious that many patrons started to hoard food and hide it in their rooms.

Scarcity also encourages focus, which can be good or bad. When time grows scarce, many students (and writers) find extra motivation to meet deadlines. But people who study poverty talk about the impact of “tunneling” on decision making. When money is tight, many people have trouble focusing on anything but the next bill that needs to be paid, and that can lead to bad decision-making.

That’s what marketers are counting on. Website designers point to scarcity techniques as one of their great innovations – the “only two tickets left at this price” technique really works. It also combines two other cognitive biases we’ve covered in this space: loss aversion (the pain of missing out on those plane tickets is greater than the fun of buying them and social proof (I would love to have this bag that everyone else must have).

Scarcity is good for business in other ways, too. Raising prices is a way to induce scarcity effects, as many people believe higher prices are associated with higher quality.

Toying with scarcity can backfire, of course. Back to the cookie experiment. In some conditions, subjects were initially shown treat jars with only two cookies, then later, a 10-cookie jar. Those subjects valued the cookies the least. In other words, if you create scarcity, you’d better stick with it, because consumers won’t react well to sudden abundance. Also, people often see through artificial scarcity. Researchers led by Seung Yun Lee of Konkuk University in Seoul, South Korea, found just that in a 2014 study.

“When consumers interpreted scarcity claims as a sales tactic, the positive effect of scarcity claims on product evaluation would be diluted,” the authors wrote.

If you lie about your “only two left” warning, you might lose all credibility.

Also, there’s this to think about: Who wants to buy the last box of Cheerios on the shelf? Isn’t it often damaged or at least beat up?

So scarcity has its limitations. But it is a human impulse. Inside organizations, there are plenty of ways scarcity bias could lead to poor decision making or tunneling. The entire tech industry is built on FOMO: fear of missing out on a cool startup acquisition; fear of missing out on a new trend, or a mini-gold rush. Acting fast is paramount. Go to any training session on pitching venture capitalists, and the instructors will talk about the need to create FOMO among potential investors (buy in now, or everyone else will).

If this kind of faux urgency sounds a bit familiar, that’s because it’s included in every Nigerian scam email you’ve ever read – for that matter, probably every scam email you’ve ever read. (Click now before your inheritance is claimed by someone else!) Criminals count on the tunneling effect of urgency; it’s a core tenet of successful scams.

How do you avoid becoming a victim of scarcity bias-induced tunneling? For starters, constantly ask: Does acquiring this thing fit my goals? Did I really want it yesterday/last week/last quarter, or is this a new impulse? One good way to check: Call a time out. The best counter-measure to faux urgency is to hit the pause button. That’s common advice for avoiding scams; it also works to break free from the tunneling mindset.

But in a broader way, never forget to challenge the basic premise of scarcity when it is presented. When a car salesman says that price is only good for today, is that really true? Is there really only one car available at that price? Maybe, if it’s a 1960s classic. But usually, the price is valid tomorrow, and next week, and maybe even next month. If you get up, walk out of the dealership, and sleep on the transaction, you’re much more likely to make a good choice.

Don’t miss a post. Sign up for my newsletter

About Bob Sullivan 1632 Articles
BOB SULLIVAN is a veteran journalist and the author of four books, including the 2008 New York Times Best-Seller, Gotcha Capitalism, and the 2010 New York Times Best Seller, Stop Getting Ripped Off! His latest, The Plateau Effect, was published in 2013, and as a paperback, called Getting Unstuck in 2014. He has won the Society of Professional Journalists prestigious Public Service award, a Peabody award, and The Consumer Federation of America Betty Furness award, and been given Consumer Action’s Consumer Excellence Award.

1 Comment

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Loss aversion: Why we hate losing more than we like winning, and why that's a trap — bobsullivan.net
  2. The cognitive bias collection — bobsullivan.net
  3. It's time to apply some people science to the vaccine hesitancy problem — bobsullivan.net

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.